How Do Voters Evaluate Performance in Opposition?

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract Recent scholarship on retrospective voting has shown that when they go to the polls, voters evaluate not only incumbent performance, but also performance of parties in opposition. So far, however, these studies have been able identify how The answers a unique open-ended question included Belgian electoral survey 2019 provide new insights into voters' minds. First, this study investigates what think about party's Second, it tests whether hold opposition responsible for state affairs country. results show are most concerned with parties' competence scrutinizing government and providing constructive criticism, dislike unconstructive overly negative Furthermore, accountable their country, albeit lesser extent than parties.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

How Do Voters Retrospectively Evaluate Wasteful Government Spending? Evidence from Individual-Level Disaster Relief

Why do voters often reward incumbents when they receive government spending? We develop a model in which distributive spending provides voters not just with a financial benefit, but also an opportunity to observe and judge the appropriateness of government decisions. Empirically, we test the model’s predictions using individuallevel data on FEMA disaster relief matched to voter turnout records,...

متن کامل

Do Voters Vote Sincerely?∗

In this paper we address the following questions: (i) To what extent is the hypothesis that voters vote sincerely testable or falsifiable? And (ii) in environments where the hypothesis is falsifiable, to what extent is the observed behavior of voters consistent with sincere voting? We show that using data only on how individuals vote in a single election, the hypothesis that voters vote sincere...

متن کامل

How Do We Evaluate Artificial Immune Systems?

The field of Artificial Immune Systems (AIS) concerns the study and development of computationally interesting abstractions of the immune system. This survey tracks the development of AIS since its inception, and then attempts to make an assessment of its usefulness, defined in terms of 'distinctiveness' and 'effectiveness.' In this paper, the standard types of AIS are examined--Negative Select...

متن کامل

How do Humans Evaluate Machine Translation

In this paper, we take a closer look at the MT evaluation process from a glass-box perspective using eye-tracking. We analyze two aspects of the evaluation task – the background of evaluators (monolingual or bilingual) and the sources of information available, and we evaluate them using time and consistency as criteria. Our findings show that monolinguals are slower but more consistent than bil...

متن کامل

How Voters Evaluate Party Competence: A Comparison Between Parties In and Out of Power

Accounts of general election outcomes increasingly talk about voters comparing parties in terms of their perceived competence to manage the economy and public services. This raises the question of how voters form evaluations of party competence. Whilst it is assumed that voters form evaluations of the incumbent based on the signals provided by its current performance in office it is less clear ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Government and Opposition

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['0017-257X', '1477-7053']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.63